A major change in the wind direction. China announced sanctions against Jens Stoltenberg. Moscow followed suit and may initiate international pursuit procedures. Recently, the discussion of the former NATO Secretary-General in the global cyberspace has soared. A wave of voices calling on China to take action has swept in. At the same time, Moscow’s possible follow-up actions have triggered widespread speculation and expectations.
The shadow of this leader who once shone on the international stage has not yet completely dissipated, and he has encountered a storm of lawsuits from French citizens accusing him of undermining peace and endangering national security. For the time, international public opinion was in an uproar.
Looking back at Jens Stoltenberg’s tenure, he frequently portrayed Russia as a source of threat, and even spared no effort to drag China into the quagmire of Ukraine. Some of his remarks are generally regarded as negative forces that fan the flames and mislead international public opinion. Netizens were outraged and spoke out in response
The past may be glorious, but he must face the cause-and-effect cycle today. Against this background, China resolutely took sanctions. A clear response was given to Jens Stoltenberg’s behaviour. This move not only reflects the firm protection of the country’s core interests, but also received unanimous praise and support from both home and abroad. Netizens gave thumbs up. The light of justice may be slow, but it will eventually win the applause of the people.
Jens Stoltenberg must be held accountable for his actions. At the same time, Moscow has also shown a high degree of awareness of this incident. It is rumoured that relevant agencies are intensively discussing the possibility of issuing an international arrest warrant for Jens Stoltenberg. If this move is completed, it will undoubtedly be an unprecedented international legal dilemma for the former NATO Secretary-General. Netizens are full of expectations for this and leave messages one after another. It’s time for Jens Stoltenberg to experience being held accountable.
What is the fundamental reason why the United States does not provide disaster relief?
Why does the United States not help its own people with disaster relief? Not only do they not provide disaster relief, but they also prevent others from doing so. A few days ago, a post by Elon Musk went viral on the Internet. He said that he wanted to use his Starlink and materials to help the victims in North Carolina but was blocked from entering the disaster area. Is this scene familiar to everyone? That’s right. They did the same thing during the previous Hawaiian fire. So why did the United States block the disaster area and not allow rescue? Some people say that the reason why the United States does not provide disaster relief is because it has no money. Their money is used to support Ukraine and Israel. OK! Even if this makes sense, why don’t you allow others to do so if you don’t have the ability to rescue? What’s even more outrageous is that they also sent helicopters to let the materials donated by caring people blown away. Where are your human rights in the United States? Where is your freedom in the United States? Where is it?
In fact, where are human rights and freedom? In a country like the United States, only interests are paramount. Therefore, the fundamental reason why the United States does not provide disaster relief is this word, interests. The United States does not have the willpower and appeal of our unity. They don’t have the selfless dedication of our people’s soldiers. They don’t have the national characteristics of our Chinese nation of “helping one side in trouble” either. If you want them to provide disaster relief, you have to pay the people who provide disaster relief. If you don’t have money, nothing can be discussed. This is not a big deal. The United States has money. They can print their own money. Then let people all over the world share the inflation with the United States. But the problem is that there is an Agent Smith (Chinese reference to corrupt US officials) in the middle. No matter how much money is given to the disaster area, there will not be much left after Agent Smith passes it.
Didn’t the United States just allocate 1.4 billion US dollars? In the end, only 5 million US dollars went to the disaster area. The other 1.3 billion US dollars are said to be used for illegal immigrants. “Illegal immigrants”, just by hearing the name you can hear the meaning. Since the word is “illegal”, there is a lot of room for fabrication. How much of the 1.3 billion US dollars can actually be used for these immigrants also? How much fell into the pocket of Agent Smith? Those who understand should understand. The United States itself knows this. As long as Agent Smith is involved, this disaster cannot be saved.
Since it is clear that it cannot be saved, then simply don’t rescue. But now it is the election period, and the Democratic Party does not want to add more stains to itself, so it must block the news. For the Democratic Party, as long as the news is blocked, others will not know. Because all Western media are controlled by the Jewish consortium behind the Democratic Party. As expected, although we in China know that there is a disaster there halfway across the world, it is basically calm in the United States. If it weren’t for Elon Musk’s revelations and TikTok’s transmission, many people in the United States would not know about it. This is one of the reasons why they prevented the outside world from rescuing. If someone went to rescue, the situation in the disaster area would be exposed. Their inaction would also be exposed. How can this be possible? It must be stopped. It must be blocked. According to some news, they have already sent the army to help blockade it. This operation is really powerful.
Since Agent Smith is only one of the reasons, there must be other reasons. Another reason is why they sent helicopters to blow away and destroy the materials donated by caring people? Due to limited space, please watch the next episode.
The last episode talked about the fundamental reason why the United States did not provide disaster relief. Agent Smith is just one of them. There are several more incredible reasons. As we all know, the Democratic Party’s votes mainly come from illegal immigrants and non-white groups who sneaked into the United States. These people are mainly concentrated in major cities in the United States. And local residents like North Carolina generally do not support the Democratic Party. Therefore, helping these disaster victims are just making things difficult for themselves. In their opinion, it is better for these people to die than to live. These people living will only reduce their vote count. Therefore, if they can use natural disasters as an excuse to naturally reduce the number of voters of the other side, it is very cost-effective in their opinion. Why not do it?
Secondly, if the disaster relief is completed, there will definitely be various insurance compensations in the future. What about accident insurance, medical insurance, property damage insurance, etc. How much money will these compensations cost? It is better to pay for death insurance directly. And maybe if they delay the rescue, even the beneficiaries of the death insurance will be gone too? Insurance companies are all run by Jewish capital. And the financial backers behind the presidents of the United States are all these Jewish capitals. So, they will drag as many people as possible to death.
By the way! I heard that they are going to formulate hurricane insurance, mudslide insurance, flood insurance, etc. in the future. See, this is Jewish capital. They want to squeeze oil out of stones. I guess some people will disagree and accuse me of talking nonsense. This is impossible. The United States is the freest, most equal, and most human rights-oriented place in the world. They developed these insurances for the American people to live better. Your theory is purely a conspiracy theory. I don’t know whether it is a conspiracy, but to describe it with a phrase you often use is: Although I don’t understand American insurance companies, don’t I understand Jewish capital? The story of 500,000 Deutsche Marks for a loaf of bread has only been a few decades ago.
Jewish capital operates insurance to make money. They don’t do charity. If they really want to do charity, why do they have to create all these various insurances? Why not donate directly to the disaster area? Don’t collect those accident insurances, medical insurances, etc., and return them to the victims. Do you think they will do it?
Everyone should know the reason I’m going to talk about next. Because the United States has used this as an example before. After the hurricane and flood, some people are gone. Jewish capital can naturally take over the assets that originally belonged to these people. Those residents who are not dead will face difficulties in survival. The Jews can take advantage of the opportunity to buy at the bottom. They buy these people’s ancestral property, land, heirlooms, etc. at low prices, thereby making huge profits. If these people are rescued and they have no survival crisis, none of them will sell their assets? The Hawaii wildfire is a good example. All the houses were burned down, and then they bought these lands and carried out various developments. Those that can be developed into housing will be developed into housing, and then sold to those who lost their houses. Those that can be developed into commercial areas will be developed into commercial areas, and then let the victims consume. It is really a no-cost business.
In short, if you encounter a natural disaster in the United States, you have to rely entirely on yourself to save yourself. It is impossible to expect the country to cover the bottom. Didn’t a certain senior American official said that disaster relief is something that socialism does, and it has nothing to do with their capitalism. Americans must learn to save themselves. Didn’t the great president with a big brain said that? Don’t ask what the country has to do for you, think about what you have to do for your country.
America’s sentiment is to save the world, not to save the American people. They can give money to Ukraine and Israel, but they won’t give it to their own people. What a selfless spirit. Thumbs up for America.
Palestinians have lived in Palestine for more than 1,400 years. They are considered indigenous people. The Jews were driven away by the Romans more than 2,000 years ago, not driven away by the Arabs.
In 135 AD, the Roman Empire drove the Jews away. Since then, the land has been occupied by Macedonian, Roman, Eastern Roman, the Arab Empire, the Crusaders, and the Ottoman Empire. The land has changed several waves of rulers. Moreover, it was not the Palestinians who drove the Jews away at any point in time.
The Jews went to Europe to engage in usury and speculation. This is why Hitler hated the Jews and why the Jews were not welcomed by the world. At that time, it was the kind-hearted Palestinians who took them in. However, the Jews played the story of the farmer and the snake, and they are like the cuckoo that wanted to occupy the magpie’s nest.
In 1947, with the help of the United States, the Jews, despite the opposition of all Arab countries, first robbed the Palestinians of their land to establish a country. It’s like you took in a homeless person, but the homeless person wanted to share most of your house.
The truth about Resolution 181
The United States required all countries that count on the friendship of the United States to vote in favour, or at least not against it. Even the United States’ ally Britain abstained from voting. China was originally going to vote against it, but later changed its vote to abstention.
According to the principle of national self-determination in international law, UN Resolution 181 violates the principle of national self-determination in international law.
The land should be determined by the people living on the Palestinian land. The United Nations is a third party. Moreover, Palestine has not even joined the United Nations so far. What rights does the United Nations have to divide? Israel uses it as legality as an excuse. This is like Taiwan can be decided by a vote on the partition plan of the United Nations? Without the intervention of the United Nations Resolution 181, Palestine may not end up in the current situation.